For Maxine Waters Math is Hard

You would think that someone on Maxine's staff would do a little fact checking before she goes on camera and tries to gin everyone up about sequester apocalypse.
170 million is slightly more than a little less of 150 million workers we have.

The good news is that her number is closer than the 500 million people who would lose their job every month that ex speaker Blinky warned us about 4 years ago.



Of course accuracy was never a strong point among liberal democrat fear mongers.

Thanks Minnesota

I'd be embarrassed for you but you did this to yourselves.The best this guy can do is nanner-nanner- boo-boo?
Instead of trying to elect statesmen to put immature clowns in office.

Total Disregard

As if anyone actually needed any more proof that the Obama administration has no regard for the safety of the citizens of this country here's this.


DHS releasing hundreds of illegal immigrants, blaming budget cuts

The Department of Homeland Security has started releasing hundreds of illegal immigrants held in local jails in anticipation of automatic budget cuts, in a move one Arizona sheriff called politically motivated -- and dangerous.
Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu said Tuesday that Immigration and Customs Enforcement released more than 500 detainees in his county alone over the weekend. A spokesman for Babeu told FoxNews.com that ICE officials have said they plan to release a total of nearly 10,000 illegal immigrants.
The numbers, though, are in dispute. ICE officials said that it's unclear how many ultimately might be released and that only 303 have been released from four Arizona facilities so far, though all those are in Pinal County. According to ICE, 2,280 detainees are still in custody in those facilities.
Babeu described the move as a "mass budget pardon" and suggested the administration was going to unnecessary lengths to demonstrate the impact of the so-called sequester.
"President Obama would never release 500 criminal illegals to the streets of his hometown, yet he has no problem with releasing them in Arizona. The safety of the public is threatened and the rule of law discarded as a political tactic in this sequester battle," he said.
An ICE spokeswoman confirmed the plans without specifying how many illegal immigrants might be released. ~snip~

Add this to the fact that commie liberal democrats are doing everything they can to try and disarm honest law abiding citizens leaving them at the the mercy of criminal illegal aliens and it's no stretch to assume where citizens stand.

But it's good to know that Obama's paycheck won't be affected by these cuts, just our well being and another liberal slap in the face to the rule of law.

How About You First Obama?

So Obama and his pals are still pushing the idea that if the sequester cuts go through it will impact the poor, the disabled, firemen, policemen and teachers.
How come it never occurs to them that maybe they should cut back on their extravagant life styles?

Sen. Coburn urges White House to freeze hiring, curb traveling to ease budget pain

A top Republican lawmaker countered warnings about the purportedly devastating impact of looming budget cuts, calling on the administration to lessen the blow by taking two simple steps -- stop hiring, and stop traveling.

Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., in a letter to the White House budget office, called Monday for a "hiring freeze" on non-essential positions. He pointed out that, amid pronouncements about the dire impact of spending cuts poised to hit starting this Friday, the administration is still advertising for a host of "lower priority jobs" -- like a staff assistant to answer phones at the Labor Department, and a policy coordinator to set up meetings at the Department of Health and Human Services.
The request follows a letter Thursday in which Coburn urged the Obama administration to cancel a 100-city tour aimed at connecting federal officials with local leaders.
Coburn is among the Republicans on Capitol Hill who claim President Obama is exaggerating the impact of the cuts. Some claim the administration already has the flexibility to target the cuts; others are looking to draft legislation to give the administration that flexibility.
Regardless, Coburn disputed claims that the cuts automatically mean customs agents, Defense civilian workers and food inspectors will have to be furloughed or laid off, as the administration has warned. Perusing the roster of federal job openings, he listed 10 positions that "could save as much as $1.4 million" -- money that could be directed toward saving other jobs, he said.~snip~

I suppose it's to much to expect San Fran Nan and her fellow dems to sacrifice their perks just because the little people are suffering..

What are the Chances?

This whole amnesty for illegal trespassing aliens thing has been going on since way before the Obamessiah ascended to the imperial presidency.

GWB was a believer in it along with RINO's deluxe John McCain and Lindsey Graham.

Fortunately for us we were heard and basically they kicked the can down the road instead of moving forward with closing the border and at least making an effort to deport criminal aliens from our country.


What do you think the chances are that the current administration will listen?

Majority of U.S. citizens say illegal immigrants should be deported

(Reuters) - More than half of U.S. citizens believe that most or all of the country's 11 million illegal immigrants should be deported, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday that highlights the difficulties facing lawmakers trying to reform the U.S. immigration system.
The online survey shows resistance to easing immigration laws despite the biggest push for reform in Congress since 2007.
Thirty percent of those polled think that most illegal immigrants, with some exceptions, should be deported, while 23 percent believe all illegal immigrants should be deported.
Only 5 percent believe all illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in the United States legally, and 31 percent want most illegal immigrants to stay.
These results are in line with other polls in recent years, suggesting that people's views on immigration have not changed dramatically since the immigration debate reignited in Congress last month, according to Ipsos pollster Julia Clark.~snip~

Yeah me neither.
Thing is people had a chance to kick the RINO's out on their fat asses the last election but instead fell for their sudden conversion to protectors of the border.
Dumb de-dumb-dumb, so once again we find ourselves in a defensive position on amnesty with  a president who's tone deaf to the will of the people.
So when the Obamessiah and the RINO's run over us we only got ourselves the blame.

D'OH!!! Moment

How anybody can possibly believe that letting any of these left wing communist, Obama butt kissing self professed professional "journalists" anywhere near something as important as a presidential debate is beyond me.

Debate co-chair: 'Mistake' to have Candy Crowley moderate presidential debate

Frank Fahrenkopf, a co-chair of the Commission on Presidential Debates, said tonight that the Commission made a "mistake" by selecting CNN anchor Candy Crowley to moderate one of the 2012 presidential debates.
Fahrenkopf, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, was speaking at the Las Vegas Country Club in Nevada. According to Jon Ralston, the Nevada-based political journalist, Fahrenkopf told the audience there that he was proud of the 2012 debate moderators, but added: “We made one mistake this time: Her name is Candy."~snip~

The MSM has had their heads so far up  Obama's ass for the last four years that every time Obama coughs they break wind. Objective journalism went out the door the moment he announced he was going to run.

Exit question, does anyone really believe this revelation will get us fair, objective and balanced debates next time?

Yeah me neither.

Still Riding the Liberal Crazy Train

Cause that's what we all need, well armed citizens with ball point pens.
What is it with liberals trying to take our means to defend ourselves, what is their end game?
I used to think it was because they think like girls but girls know how to defend themselves so there has to be  some other motivation. The only one I can think of is that want us to be dependent on government for even the most basic things.
With the track record of government in just about every other facet of our lives do we really want to trust them to defend ourselves and families from violent criminal acts?
Nice to know they think we can buy an arsenal at Walmart or Target stores.