Sununu challenges CNN........

.....to identify the veniality.



OK I'll admit I had to look up Veniality and somehow that definition doesn't seem to apply as well as the definition of Venality does.

the condition or quality of being venal; openness to bribery or corruption.

Which would be more correct as to the hopeful allegations being made by the democrat owned media.
He's correct that there has been no indication or proof.

Apology from CNN's Brooke Baldwin

Sorry she got caught.

Not that CNN has that big of an audience but fortunately we have the internet which is why she got called out on what is really a culture of hatred for the military at CNN.
Liberal journalists cocoon themselves with like minded individuals so there's a good chance she "heard" that conversation from some of the deep thinkers at CNN.

These people expose themselves all the time and thanks to the internet we can pick up on it.

Media Enablers

Here you have another example of the liberal/commie "media" searching for a way to excuse the violence of protesters.
Peaceful protest is one thing and I'm all for citizens standing together when need be. But it's another thing for the media to focus on agitation and searching for ways to justify violent reactions.

CNN Anchor on Baltimore Riots: Some Veterans Are Coming Home 'Ready to do Battle'

The liberal media doesn't employ journalists, they employ social justice warriors and agitators.

Here's another example.

CNN’s Marc Lamont Hill on Baltimore: ‘This Is Not a Riot’ But ‘Uprisings’ Against ‘Police Terrorism’

Candy Crowley Slinks away from CNN

The word is that the leftist/progressive ringer moderator of the debate between the Obamessiah and Mitt Romney is "voluntarily" leaving CNN.

CANDY CROWLEY OUT AT CNN

After 27 years and more than a year's worth of rumors, CNN pulled its own Friday news dump with the announcement today that Candy Crowley is leaving the left-wing network. “[I]t is with mixed emotions, that I wanted to let you know that Candy has let us know that she has made the decision to move on, so she can embark on the next chapter of her already prolific career,” CNN chief Jeff Zucker writes.~snip~

Her performance as an "impartial moderator" illustrates perfectly the reason that republican presidential candidates need to stop allowing the leftist/communist media decide the terms of presidential debates.
Crowley's save of Obama was all that saturated the media for days afterward overwhelming any other issue.
She basically inserted herself into what was supposed to be a neutral setting  to allow the candidates to debate various issues.

This is the continuing legacy of the biased lapdog media and the cycle needs to be broken.
In this decade there are many more media outlets than the "big three" and it's past time for the republican party to demand either a more friendly or neutral venue.
After all the commie/leftists have been demanding the use of their biased lapdogs for decades.

Maybe 2015 will be different.

Like a Dog With a Bone

I remember seeing this in the wake of the velvet mafias attempt to lie, manipulate and extort A&E over the comments made by Phil Robertson in the GQ hit piece about Duck Dynasty.

After trying to distort what the guy actually said, even though the article was there for all the world to see, they pretty much got spanked in the arena of public opinion after A&E backed down.
For whatever reason.

Of course the militant gay agitators couldn't let it go and pick another battle, they immediately started to scour the web looking for some kind of smoking gun to use against Phil Robertson.
This is the best they could find.

DUCK HUNT: CNN FABRICATES NEW PHIL ROBERTSON CONTROVERSY

Even though CNN's phony controversy hasn't even been able to pick up traction at MSNBC, that hasn't stopped the left-wing cable news network from attempting to manufacture more trouble for Phil Robertson and "Duck Dynasty." But why would we expect anything less from the same network that fabricated evidence to frame a working-class Hispanic man?
The CNN report below, covering Robertson's humorous relaying of marriage advice, is taken ultra-seriously by the CNN correspondent, and asks, "What is the tipping point to getting kicked off the air?"
Does CNN not hear the crowd laughing? It is obvious that Robertson is going for laughs. That doesn't mean he isn't trying to make a point (his wife was 16 when they married) but there is no question he is performing and exaggerating to entertain a crowd that is entertained.~snip~

A little tongue in cheek marital advice that nobody is taking seriously.
Well except for the the same group that tells everybody what morality and Christianity really is, you know those ultra tolerant  gays rights activists.
How have we gotten to the point that the least moral and Christian among us are defining what it is to be either?
What's really funny is that despite they're proclamations of evil wrong doing, again, the video is available and people can make their own determination about it.
Hair is being pulled and teeth are being gnashed and no one cares.

Cold Front Moving into Hell?

Must be a freeze warning in Hades, CNN actually being critical of the Obama administration?
Almost 5 year into this failed administration and just now someone hits these idiots with a clue bat.
Better late than never I suppose.

Ashleigh Banfield Animated over Shutdown

Here's a video from the Washington Free Beacon showing Ashleigh Banfield's animated ire over the shutdown.
enjoy. 

Wolfie at CNN has Moment of Clarity

Which just goes to show that even CNN can't ignore the obvious and prop up the Obama regime all the time.

Blitzer sarcastically notes the administration has “only had three years” to get ready for the roll-out.

from:WeaselZippers

Awww No Hillary Documentary: Update Et tu NBC?

In a lot of different ways this is kind of disappointing.

Director nixes Hillary documentary for CNN after pressure from Clinton aides

The filmmaker who was planning to produce a controversial documentary on Hillary Clinton has pulled out of the project, claiming that Clinton aides exerted pressure on him and that dozens of potential sources refused to grant interviews.
Director Charles Ferguson revealed his decision regarding the now-canned documentary for CNN Films in a column posted Monday on The Huffington Post. He cited opposition from members of both parties -- the Republican National Committee had threatened to boycott presidential primary debates hosted by CNN over the project -- but indicated the strongest resistance came from the Clinton world.
"When I approached people for interviews, I discovered that nobody, and I mean nobody, was interested in helping me make this film," he said. "Not Democrats, not Republicans -- and certainly nobody who works with the Clintons, wants access to the Clintons, or dreams of a position in a Hillary Clinton administration."
Ferguson said that after approaching more than 100 people, "only two persons who had ever dealt with Mrs. Clinton would agree to an on-camera interview, and I suspected that even they would back out."~snip~

I seriously doubt republicans threatening to boycott CNN had much effect on the decision, I've only been able to make it through 5 minutes of their "reporting" before the tears from my laughter made it impossible to see.
My guess is that Hill put the kibosh on anybody cooperating for the documentary so it wouldn't cut into any of her book sales. I mean after all why would low information voters bother reading a book when they can just watch it on TV?
I don't think it has anything to do with her worrying that the truth might actually get out there either seeing as how CNN has no problem carrying her water when she lies anyway.

Clinton says she 'misspoke' about sniper fire

Yeah that's the ticket.
One story and then never spoken about it again, I wonder if they'll remind their viewers about her less than honest assertion when she runs in 2015 like they did when she testified in front of congress about Benghazi?
Oh wait.........


update: NBC Scraps Hillary Clinton Miniseries

So who out there doesn't think Bill and Hill had this die on the vine?

Predictability of the Liberal Media

I'm flabbergasted by the liberal/commie media's attempt to constantly insult the intelligence of the average American.
Somehow a very small population of virulent anti-America self appointed busybodies have convinced an alarmingly large number people that they represent the opinions of a majority of citizens.

The way they do it is by simply lying their asses off and they do it as quickly and forcefully as possible before anyone else can possibly get any facts.
Then, even after the facts start coming out, they continue to lie.
Just a quick look at the headlines on memeorandum can show you that.

Navy Yard shooting: AR-15, back in the news -- briefly

Lupica: AR-15 is the rifle for the 'sport' of hunting humans

NY Daily News Slams ‘Made For Murder’ AR-15 After Navy Yard Shooting (PHOTO)

The above are just some of the examples you can find but the only problem is that the shooter didn't use an AR-15 his weapon of choice was a shotgun. So of course CNN, in an effort to push more gun control creates the AR-15 shot gun.

Gun control is an issue that the liberal/commie media is not doing very well at but that doesn't mean that they won't continue to lie and propagandize in a desperate attempt to force their beliefs on everyone.
While addressing the real issues of mental health behind these types of tragedies will get scant coverage allowing the problem to continue.

The liberal/commie media are not our friends and are not interested in anyones well being, what they are interested in is forcing their ideas and beliefs on us. Whether we like it of not.

So Who Needs CNN, NBC?

I've been kind of reading about the whole deal where the RNC has pretended they have a back bone and sent a letter to CNN and NBC telling them to ditch plans for their slobber fests for Hillary Clinton.
Or there'll be no debates.

Yeah right, the same RNC that supports squishy RINOs like John McCain and Lindsey Graham . You know, the 2 weasels who have spent their careers kissing the behinds of the liberal/commie media and their fellow travelers in the democrat party.
I'm not talking about kissing the well washed  periphery either but the soft gooey center.

Media is changing, the Washington Post was sold at around 25% of what it sold for previously. Liberal media is losing advertisers and readers daily due to the rise in alternatives. "Journalists" no longer have a monopoly over the way people get their news anymore. More people are wanting "reporters" to give them just the facts, not tell us what we should think it means.

So why the hell does the RNC let them dictate the medium and conditions?
 I would think that after the total embarrassment that is Candy Crowley happened they would be seriously rethinking allowing the communist news networks to decide how to present the message.

Truth is if conservatives are going to stick with the RNC then some changes need to happen, the liberal/commie networks need the RNC more than the RNC needs them.
Crawling to the biased media to get our message heard only gives them legitimacy that they don't deserve, and allowing them to dictate conditions gives them power that they can misuse.

We don't need them but they do need us, maybe it's time for the RNC to push back and tell the liberal/commie media how it's going to be instead of the other way around.

If they can do that then there's hope they'll abandon squishy RINOs and get behind some candidates that people will be willing to support for a change.

CNN's Ashleigh Banfield...Idiot

It never ceases to amaze me how progressive liberal idiots continue to try and make comparisons between Christianity and Islam.
It's just one other way they show their stupidity by demonstrating that they don't know shit about either one.

CNN Anchor Draws Legal Parallel Between Catholic Teacher's Firing and Sharia Law Stoning

Chalk this one up to the absurd. CNN's Ashleigh Banfield on Wednesday tried to draw a legal parallel between a Sharia Law execution and a Catholic school firing a teacher for violating her contract by disobeying church teaching on pregnancy. Banfield argued both violated the teacher's Constitutional rights.
"Well if it's an Islamic school and they decide to go with Sharia Law and they decide to stone me for this, they can't do that either," Banfield ridiculously argued. "Then don't sign up to be the teacher," responded prosecutor Christine Grillo, who multiple times reiterated that the teacher had violated her contract.
The teacher in question, Christa Dias, was fired from her position with the Archdiocese of Cincinnati because she got pregnant through artificial insemination, contrary to the teaching of the Catholic church. Since her contract stipulated that she could not do that, Dias was fired.
Banfield was obviously frustrated with Dias's plight. "At what point, though, do their rules and regulations stomp all over your rights as an American?" she fretted, comparing the firing to segregation.
"Separation of church and state," answered Grillo. "You are deciding to work for a Catholic school. It's just like deciding to attend a Catholic school. You are there – you must abide by the rules and regulations or they are free at will to kick you out."~snip~

There's just so much stupid here I don't even know where to begin, but the first thing that jumps out is the vast difference between being fired from a job and being stoned to death. The former allows you to go out and whine about how your rights have been violated (which they weren't, she signed a contract to behave in a certain manner and didn't so she forfeited her job), the latter just simply allows you to die and then nothing.

I would think that the first thing liberal morons would notice is that that there are all kinds of reasons to kill someone in Islam, Christianity not so much.
Yeah I know all about what supposed Christians did in the middle ages to Jews, witches, muslims etc. but then again that's where their true ignorance really comes in. If they actually understood Christianity then they would know that even though those things were done in it's name, they were nowhere near Christian acts. They were committed by men for power, not for Christ.

CNN needs to quit hiring people to comment on subjects that they know nothing about.
It's embarrassing.

CNN...Muted on Gosnell, Yukkin' it up Over Romney Advice

And what was Romney's advice?
Psalms 127:3-5



Why do they find someone encouraging others to build loving families so funny?
It's a shame they can't seem to focus that high toned, elitist perception to a multi-murdering baby killer but they seem to have plenty of time to go after our rights and make fun of middle class values.
Schmucks.

Liberal Media Speculates on the "Usual Suspects"

So we have this terrible, tragic bombing in Boston today. You just got to feel for the families who are grieving for their loss and the injured. Not much is really known yet but I, like many others, hope that the ones who committed these acts are found quickly and brought to justice.

I've been monitoring various links looking for updates as things move on and have run across the usual tin hatters that seep out of the sewer when something tragic happens. Like Alex Jones taking advantage in order to keep his ad revenue coming in for his websites and ginning up the crazies out there to foam at the mouth at the "ebil gubbermint" and what not.

No surprise there.

But apparently the liberal media are still looking for the "right-wing" extremist that they froth about all the time to gin up their brain dead liberal base.
I found these while looking over Weasel Zippers.
First CNN.



And then the always drooling, intellectually stunted, Obama fluffer Chris Matthews.




They can ignore real news like the Benghazi cover up or the trial of Kermit Gosnell, you know things happening in real time but speculation about "right wing" terrorism without any proof seems to be "news worthy" to them.
No wonder people are flocking to the web and social media like Facebook and twitter to know what's going on in the world.
Cause they sure can't find it from the "mainstream news".

You know no one had to speculate on the tendency of the Occupy movement to have terroristic tendencies seeing as how some had full blown plans to bomb a bridge.

How come tingles never foamed at the mouth about that?

Why Crowley should have kept her trap shut

She was so eager to jump in and save the day, you know....to get those prized Obama points that every libtard journalist strives for.

“I heard the president speak at the time. I, sort of, reread a lot of stuff about Libya because I knew we’d probably get a Libya question so I kind of wanted to be up on it,” said Crowley. “I knew that the president had said, you know, these acts of terror won’t stand. Or, whatever the whole quote was.”
“Right after that I did turn around and say, but you’re totally correct that they spent two weeks telling us this was about a tape and that that there was this riot outside the Benghazi consulate which there wasn’t,” Crowley added.
“He was right in the main, I just think he picked the wrong word,” Crowley concluded. She went on to say that her instinct forced her to correct Romney even though his “thrust” was correct.

Of course her "instinct" was to protect "dear leader", when is the American public going to demand better from the progressive media?
If the networks and cable news outlets care about their bottom line it maybe time to clean house and find "real journalists" to take their place.
You know, people who stick to reporting the facts and refrain from being the propaganda arm of the democrat party.
Hacks.

 

The Lefts Great Expectations

So Barry got his clock cleaned in the first debate and Joe basically showed his ass during the VP debate but no worries, liberals say Barry'll really bring it tonight.
The excuses are legion, he had an off night, he didn't prepare properly etc.,etc..
To bad he didn't think he had a bad night.

But progressives are fired up now, they say Obama does much better in town hall type debates, They even got a far left CNN "journalist" moderator to pick and choose the questions of the "undecided voters" *cough* leftist plants*cough*  and to throw a little spin into the mix if Obama gets a little confused.
Yup, lots of expectations for a guy who got a Nobel Prize for scratching his behind promising "Hope and Change" to get elected in 2008.
I guess Mitt ain't got much of a chance what with the economy the way it is, gas prices way up and the deficit just chugging along. As far as I know we still ain't got a budget either.

Barry just needs to sell us on his accomplishments, like Obamacare...that hardly anybody wants, along with gays being able to serve openly in the military...while millions have dropped out of the work force because there ain't no freaking jobs. Killing the coal industry and hobbling oil and gas production.
And of course bringing awareness to Big Bird.
Oh yeah....and he killed Bin Laden.

I gotta tell you, the biggest mystery to me is that how could they possibly have been able to find any "undecideds" for this debate at all. Because to me it seems like a no-brainer....Barry has got to go in November and there ain't no way he'll be able to weasel out of it in this debate or any other.