Thursday, February 28, 2013

For Maxine Waters Math is Hard

You would think that someone on Maxine's staff would do a little fact checking before she goes on camera and tries to gin everyone up about sequester apocalypse.
170 million is slightly more than a little less of 150 million workers we have.

The good news is that her number is closer than the 500 million people who would lose their job every month that ex speaker Blinky warned us about 4 years ago.

Of course accuracy was never a strong point among liberal democrat fear mongers.

Wednesday, February 27, 2013

Thanks Minnesota

I'd be embarrassed for you but you did this to yourselves.The best this guy can do is nanner-nanner- boo-boo?
Instead of trying to elect statesmen to put immature clowns in office.

Tuesday, February 26, 2013

Total Disregard

As if anyone actually needed any more proof that the Obama administration has no regard for the safety of the citizens of this country here's this.

DHS releasing hundreds of illegal immigrants, blaming budget cuts

The Department of Homeland Security has started releasing hundreds of illegal immigrants held in local jails in anticipation of automatic budget cuts, in a move one Arizona sheriff called politically motivated -- and dangerous.
Pinal County Sheriff Paul Babeu said Tuesday that Immigration and Customs Enforcement released more than 500 detainees in his county alone over the weekend. A spokesman for Babeu told that ICE officials have said they plan to release a total of nearly 10,000 illegal immigrants.
The numbers, though, are in dispute. ICE officials said that it's unclear how many ultimately might be released and that only 303 have been released from four Arizona facilities so far, though all those are in Pinal County. According to ICE, 2,280 detainees are still in custody in those facilities.
Babeu described the move as a "mass budget pardon" and suggested the administration was going to unnecessary lengths to demonstrate the impact of the so-called sequester.
"President Obama would never release 500 criminal illegals to the streets of his hometown, yet he has no problem with releasing them in Arizona. The safety of the public is threatened and the rule of law discarded as a political tactic in this sequester battle," he said.
An ICE spokeswoman confirmed the plans without specifying how many illegal immigrants might be released. ~snip~
Add this to the fact that commie liberal democrats are doing everything they can to try and disarm honest law abiding citizens leaving them at the the mercy of criminal illegal aliens and it's no stretch to assume where citizens stand.

But it's good to know that Obama's paycheck won't be affected by these cuts, just our well being and another liberal slap in the face to the rule of law.

Monday, February 25, 2013

How About You First Obama?

So Obama and his pals are still pushing the idea that if the sequester cuts go through it will impact the poor, the disabled, firemen, policemen and teachers.
How come it never occurs to them that maybe they should cut back on their extravagant life styles?

Sen. Coburn urges White House to freeze hiring, curb traveling to ease budget pain

A top Republican lawmaker countered warnings about the purportedly devastating impact of looming budget cuts, calling on the administration to lessen the blow by taking two simple steps -- stop hiring, and stop traveling.
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., in a letter to the White House budget office, called Monday for a "hiring freeze" on non-essential positions. He pointed out that, amid pronouncements about the dire impact of spending cuts poised to hit starting this Friday, the administration is still advertising for a host of "lower priority jobs" -- like a staff assistant to answer phones at the Labor Department, and a policy coordinator to set up meetings at the Department of Health and Human Services.
The request follows a letter Thursday in which Coburn urged the Obama administration to cancel a 100-city tour aimed at connecting federal officials with local leaders.
Coburn is among the Republicans on Capitol Hill who claim President Obama is exaggerating the impact of the cuts. Some claim the administration already has the flexibility to target the cuts; others are looking to draft legislation to give the administration that flexibility.
Regardless, Coburn disputed claims that the cuts automatically mean customs agents, Defense civilian workers and food inspectors will have to be furloughed or laid off, as the administration has warned. Perusing the roster of federal job openings, he listed 10 positions that "could save as much as $1.4 million" -- money that could be directed toward saving other jobs, he said.~snip~
I suppose it's to much to expect San Fran Nan and her fellow dems to sacrifice their perks just because the little people are suffering..

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

What are the Chances?

This whole amnesty for illegal trespassing aliens thing has been going on since way before the Obamessiah ascended to the imperial presidency.

GWB was a believer in it along with RINO's deluxe John McCain and Lindsey Graham.

Fortunately for us we were heard and basically they kicked the can down the road instead of moving forward with closing the border and at least making an effort to deport criminal aliens from our country.

What do you think the chances are that the current administration will listen?

Majority of U.S. citizens say illegal immigrants should be deported
(Reuters) - More than half of U.S. citizens believe that most or all of the country's 11 million illegal immigrants should be deported, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll released on Wednesday that highlights the difficulties facing lawmakers trying to reform the U.S. immigration system.
The online survey shows resistance to easing immigration laws despite the biggest push for reform in Congress since 2007.
Thirty percent of those polled think that most illegal immigrants, with some exceptions, should be deported, while 23 percent believe all illegal immigrants should be deported.
Only 5 percent believe all illegal immigrants should be allowed to stay in the United States legally, and 31 percent want most illegal immigrants to stay.
These results are in line with other polls in recent years, suggesting that people's views on immigration have not changed dramatically since the immigration debate reignited in Congress last month, according to Ipsos pollster Julia Clark.~snip~
Yeah me neither.
Thing is people had a chance to kick the RINO's out on their fat asses the last election but instead fell for their sudden conversion to protectors of the border.
Dumb de-dumb-dumb, so once again we find ourselves in a defensive position on amnesty with  a president who's tone deaf to the will of the people.
So when the Obamessiah and the RINO's run over us we only got ourselves the blame.

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

D'OH!!! Moment

How anybody can possibly believe that letting any of these left wing communist, Obama butt kissing self professed professional "journalists" anywhere near something as important as a presidential debate is beyond me.

Debate co-chair: 'Mistake' to have Candy Crowley moderate presidential debate

Frank Fahrenkopf, a co-chair of the Commission on Presidential Debates, said tonight that the Commission made a "mistake" by selecting CNN anchor Candy Crowley to moderate one of the 2012 presidential debates.
Fahrenkopf, a former chairman of the Republican National Committee, was speaking at the Las Vegas Country Club in Nevada. According to Jon Ralston, the Nevada-based political journalist, Fahrenkopf told the audience there that he was proud of the 2012 debate moderators, but added: “We made one mistake this time: Her name is Candy."~snip~

The MSM has had their heads so far up  Obama's ass for the last four years that every time Obama coughs they break wind. Objective journalism went out the door the moment he announced he was going to run.

Exit question, does anyone really believe this revelation will get us fair, objective and balanced debates next time?

Yeah me neither.

Still Riding the Liberal Crazy Train

Cause that's what we all need, well armed citizens with ball point pens.
What is it with liberals trying to take our means to defend ourselves, what is their end game?
I used to think it was because they think like girls but girls know how to defend themselves so there has to be  some other motivation. The only one I can think of is that want us to be dependent on government for even the most basic things.
With the track record of government in just about every other facet of our lives do we really want to trust them to defend ourselves and families from violent criminal acts?
Nice to know they think we can buy an arsenal at Walmart or Target stores.

Monday, February 18, 2013

A Nation of Victims:Update

While the liberal democrats are doing their best to disarm law abiding citizens some are providing a public service for women on what to do if attacked.
From the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs.

What To Do If You Are Attacked
These tips are designed to help you protect yourself on campus, in town, at your home, or while you travel.  These are preventative tips and are designed to instruct you in crime prevention tactics.
1.Be realistic about your ability to protect yourself.
2.Your instinct may be to scream, go ahead!  It may startle your attacker and give you an opportunity to run away.
3.Kick off your shoes if you have time and can't run in them.
4.Don't take time to look back; just get away.
5.If your life is in danger, passive resistance may be your best defense.
6.Tell your attacker that you have a disease or are menstruating.
7.Vomiting or urinating may also convince the attacker to leave you alone.
8.Yelling, hitting or biting may give you a chance to escape, do it!
9.Understand that some actions on your part might lead to more harm.
10.Remember, every emergency situation is different.  Only you can decide which action is most appropriate.  

What liberals are trying to do is create a nation of victims, number 8 is the only tip that really suggests active defense followed closely by number 9. Which is basically liberal speech for "accept the inevitability and <insert alternative here>".
 Notice mace and pepper spray are omitted, I wonder if that's a tacit admission that they rarely work?
Personally I'd prefer that the attacker does the urinating while facing down the barrel of a 9mm Glock.
Which, interestingly, didn't make the list.

From Michelle Malkin

Here's a nice little addendum to this post.

Colorado Democrat: Women Don’t Need Guns If They ‘Feel Like They’re Going To Be Raped’ *UPDATED

The charge of which party is really tone deaf on the issue of violence against women is up in the air again.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

The Degradation of Panties

Wow, sometimes I wonder where feminists come up with things to be outraged about. It's OK for them to dress up in vagina costumes but somehow theres a whole slew of them who cringe at the word "panties".

Why the Word 'Panties' Is So Awful (And What to Do About It)
Every month or so, I receive a glossy coupon from Victoria's Secret in my mailbox. "Free panty!" it beckons. "No purchase necessary!"
Reading those words, I cringe a little bit. Not because I hate underwear—I'm an ardent lover of underwear. It's because I hate the word "panty." I hate the plural form of "panty" as well. "Panties" creeps me out.
And apparently I'm not alone. In addition to a slew of blog posts and message boards denouncing the word, The Huffington Post's Zoƫ Triska named it "the worst word ever." included "panties" in its list of the "Five Words That Need To Be Banned From English."
Why does the word "panties" bother so many people?~snip~

My questions about this are several, for one thing I had a buddy from Great Britain who referred to them as frilly undies. So it seems to me that the term "panties" ain't carved in stone. Either works well for me.
The next question I got to ask is where is the outrage from feminists over all the woman and children forced into poverty due to Obama's and the democrats policies?
I mean if they really care about women's issues I would think the space used for this article would have been better served by pointing out the number of working mothers who've lost their jobs since the Obamessiah ascended to the presidency and to pointedly ask what the hell he is going to do about it.

But no, what we get here is just another distraction from real issues that affect real people because the liberal press and feminists have to prop up Obama and cover for him by avoiding the truth at all costs.

So yeah lets get all weewee'd up over what to call panties, I'm sure the democrat party appreciates it.

Thursday, February 14, 2013

Pelosi uses Congress and Dignity.... the same sentence. That's hilarious as hell, like multiple botox injections elevate her to some sort of wise political sage.

She and her fellow democrat travelers have no problem confiscating  the hard earned wages of us unwashed masses but you even hint at cutting the pay of congress and she gets all snippy.

Pelosi: Congressional pay cut undermines dignity of the job
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Thursday that she opposes a cut in congressional pay because it would diminish the dignity of lawmakers' jobs.
"I don't think we should do it; I think we should respect the work we do," Pelosi told reporters in the Capitol. "I think it's necessary for us to have the dignity of the job that we have rewarded."
The comments were made in the context of the looming sequester, which would force across-the-board cuts affecting most federal offices, including Congress. With lawmakers nowhere near a deal to avert those cuts, federal agencies are bracing for ways to absorb them with minimum damage to programs and personnel.

I wonder if ex speaker Blinky engages her brain before she opens her mouth? Hey Nance!!! What about the dignity of the hard working individual and business owners who's pay you have no problem cutting to pay for your over indulgence in funding useless government programs?
I could go for the dignity of being able to keep some of the money I work for.

Friday, February 1, 2013

Christian? Your Money is no Good

So...what has to be so broken in our society that a donation from a Christian church isn't welcome?

Church Says Wounded Warrior Project Refused Their Money

A Christian church and school in Florida are devastated after they said Wounded Warrior Project refused to accept their fund raising effort because it was “religious in nature.”
“We were heartbroken,” said Wallace Cooley, pastor of Liberty Baptist Church and Academy in Fort Pierce, Fla.
Cooley said they had already paid a $100 registration fee to raise money for the Wounded Warrior Project and were about to launch the campaign when they received an email from the organization.
The church had planned on taking up a special offering on the last Sunday in February and students were collecting money from family and friends.
“We must decline the opportunity to be the beneficiary of your event due to our fundraising event criteria, which doesn’t allow community events to be religious in nature,” read an email from the WWP community events team. “Please note your registration fee will be refunded within the next 7-10 business days.”~snip~
Is WWP concerned that if they accept donations from a group of Christians that the tightfisted  scrooges of the left and their useful idiot atheists won't contribute funds to their charity. Cause we all know how much progressives and atheists care about those in the military. Because that's what they are known for, their charitable works with the poor and downtrodden.

OK I'm done laughing now.
Charitable giving is what Christians do.......I mean how many soup kitchens are created and run by atheists? How many homeless shelters are established and run on donations by progressives?
Come on WWP, the backlash you have to worry about is not from atheists and liberal democrats cause they don't give a shit about wounded warriors, the back lash will come from those you humiliate when they try and help.
There's plenty of other charities out there that will happily take their money to help wounded veterans.